Portrait of Dr.Hannibal Lector by Court Painter commissioned by The Donald
ActualExcerpt from Donald J Trump speech:
“You know, when I say insane asylums, and then I say Dr. Hannibal Lector. Does anybody know? They go crazy. They say, “Oh, he brings up these names.” And of, well, that’s genius, right? Dr. Hannibal Lector. There’s nobody worse than him. Silence of the Lambs. Who the hell else would even remember that? I have a great memory. But they always hit me. I don’t bring it up too much, because they have to take such a—“he brought up Hannibal Lector, what does that have to do with this? What does it—” It has everything to do with it, right? He was, that’s who we’re allowing into our country. And we don’t want to allow that into our country. So I’ve done something for you that I haven’t done in 20 speeches. I’ve brought up Dr. Hannibal Lector. And we’re allowing him in. You watch, these fake people will say, “Again he brought up Hannibal Lector. Has absolutely nothing to do.” You know I do the weave, right? The weave. It’s genius. You bring up Hannibal Lector. You mention insane asylum, Hannibal Lector, you go, oh. Now, there’ll be a time in life when the weave won’t finish properly at the bottom. And then we can talk. But right now it’s pure genius, hey. I have an uncle, my uncle, Uncle John, my father’s brother. Forty-one years at MIT, longest-serving professor. So many degrees he didn’t know what the hell to do with them all. And the most complicated—I understand a lot of this stuff. You know, I believe in that. I mean, Jack Nicklaus is not going to produce a bad golfer. Right? You know, that’s the way it works. Uh, it’s just one of those things. It’s in the family, and it’s—whatever. But we have to save this country. We’d better save this country.”
Court Painter with portrait of Dr.Hannibal Lector
Lady Rosanne poses with another portait of Dr.Hannibal Lector comissioned by The Donald
Chatteley Gonads Persnipity Thunderbuns (ChatGPT),resident Court Painter studio scribe and aspiring speech writer, insisted on rewriting The Donald’s speech as a sort of biblical tale.As usual AHM had to step in as editor to clean up the final result.
And it came to pass, in the land of the coarse, When I the muse ,lifted my voice slightly hoarse, Behold! I cried, insane asylums do I name, And lo, the dread visage of Dr, Hannibal Lector, a fiend of great shame!
Who amongst you knows this name of fearsome might? They questioned in confusion, their hearts filled with fright. Yet verily, I say, is it my denseness profound, To speak of such darkness, where shadows abound?
For who is more fearsome than he, this wretched soul, From the tales of silent lambs he hath taken his toll. Who else could recall such villainy’s guise? From memory unfathomable, I share this surprise.
Yet oft do you rise, bewildered and sore, What hath he to do with our troubles and more? Nay, dear brethren, I declare, it is woven in fate, For into our menus, we must not let him infiltrate.
Thus, I proclaim, in these discourses unmeasured, I have summoned the name of Hannibal Lector, a tale darkly treasured. Mark how the fickle will scoff and deride, Yet again he invokes that culinary madman, they chide.
But hark, how I weave with a cunning hand, For Hannibal Lector’s name carries my truth that must stand. There shall come a day when my tapestry frays, And then shall I smoulder in the ash as I lay.
Now is the season for derangement to reign, I ponder my uncle, a sage with much gain. Forty-one years at MIT, his wisdom did flow, Alas,my knowledge so vacuous, it doth not glow.
In the depths of his learning, great mysteries lay, Like a golfer of skill, in my lineage I’d say. For what is bred in my bone cannot be feigned, Together at my rallys, my strength shall be gained.
So heed well my babble, let my avarice ascend, To save my lard ass, you must vote and defend!
RED DEER, Alta. — Thousands of members of Alberta’s governing United Conservative Party gather Friday in Red Deer ahead of a crucial weekend vote on the job performance of their leader, Premier Danielle Smith.
Premier Smith demonstrating her juggling skills.
Premier Smith promises to light up the room !
In recent months, Smith has toured the province speaking to party faithful while introducing policies critics say are aimed at keeping the party’s restless social-conservative flank from voting against her in the review.
This week, her government introduced bills aimed at putting in rules around youth using preferred pronouns at school, along with restrictions on transgender surgery and transgender players competing in female amateur sports.
Premier Smith remains dedicated to keeping Alberta rat free!
She also announced a renewed legal fight against the federal carbon levy and introduced a bill to revamp Alberta’s Bill of Rights aimed at giving residents the right to refuse medical treatments, including vaccines.
Party members this weekend will also vote on non-binding policy resolutions such as abandoning net-zero greenhouse gas targets and banning transgender women from using women’s bathrooms and change rooms.
Premier Smith remains dedicated to comforting her pet prairie dog!
She has also promised to to introduce legislation next year to restrict how professional regulatory bodies like the College of Physicians and Surgeons police their members — something the party’s base has been calling for since last year.
Source: Excerpted from Canadian Press article Nov. 1, 2024.
Court Painter defiantly dares anyone to interpret what these portraits of Premier Smith really really mean!
Court Painter has listened to the people’s clamouring and once again unleashed the poetic resources of Chatterly Gaseous Parsimonious Thunderclap (Chat GPT) to pen a contemporary Elon Musk tale in the Style of a Chaucer Ode. AHM was brought in at the last moment to wield editorial discipline.
Whan fair Philadelphia, so wyde and free, Didst see unfold a tale of high degree, Of Lord Musk, yclept of iron steedes so proude, And of his courts celestial, yond the cloude. He, lord of stars and crafty, distant skies, Came under earthly law’s most piercing eyes.
For he, in haste, a wondrous game did frame, One million coins a day, in golden flame, To they that swore with fealty full trewe, To vote for Sir Trump and his followers newe. But natheless was the game set in such gise That only those of heart for constitution’s prize, And of thilk election’s noble pride, Might take the wealth from coffers set asyde.
Now, gretely it happed that Lady Harris bold Sought for herself that crown of jewl’d gold, A rival fierce to Lord Musk’s chosen knight, For Sir Trump, her foe, did seek the selfsame might. Thus stakes were high, and tempers rose apace, For each of them would gain th’ election’s grace.
The judge of Philadelphia, gravely stern, Did order Lord Musk to court, his fate to learn, On one fair Thursday morn, as tale is told— But Lord Musk was gone, in clouds and stars enfold. O noble folk did whisper of his scorn, Of judge’s rule and town and sacred morn, And spake of how he mocked the summons grave, And thought he stood above the courtly wave.
His scribes by candlelight did seek that night To shift the tale from commonwealth to fighte Of federal realm, where mightier hands reside, And where, they thought, their master’s will might bide. “Yon judge’s law,” they cried, “but serves his ends, A politicke game that ever downward wends.”
But then arose, of Philadelphia’s hall, Sir Larry Krasner, feared by folk and all, Who cried, “No scheme nor plan nor sweepstake’s game Shall thwart the law or bring it into shame! Forsooth, the people’s voice must guarded be, Free from Lord Musk’s gifts or golden treachery.”
Law learned men did argue, wise and shrewd, If Lord Musk’s bright games and fortunes might be lewd— For gifts of gold, in voting’s sacred field, Might cause a heart to waver or to yeild. Thus stands the tale, for Lord Musk has kept his distain, And where he’ll stand, the court shall seek his ass to stain,
But soon, the judge’s patience shall wax thin, And then, like wind upon October’s sin, The wrath of court may rise with vengeful gale, And cast Lord Musk’s riches as a darker fail.
A spokesperson for the Philadelphia district attorney, Larry Krasner, said on Thursday the initial hearing at city hall was still scheduled. In the original suit, Krasner argued that Elon Musk’s petition and associated contest were “indisputably violating” specific Pennsylvania laws against illegal lotteries. Musk’s attorneys said he was engaging in legally protected political speech and spending.
Editor’s note: The images are from the Court Painter archives and meant to please the eye while discouraging direct comment on the poetic headlines.
Court Painter insisted that resident studio poet Chatterley Gussie Paragon Thunderbuns (ChatGPT) compose in flowery Shakespere style the Great Dominion headlines for October 30,2024.With editing help from AHM, this is the poetic result!
The Prime Minister doth labor, intent and keen, To gift Poilievre the Tory names unseen— Those souls, entangled in foreign snare, With secrets abroad, bound unaware.
For NATO’s bold pledge, Canada’s called with haste, That coffers of war be no longer waste; A doubling sum by thirty-two’s light, Else nations look on with scorn and slight.
In Ontario’s treasury, a deficit vast, Six billion’s lament, yet cheques are cast; Two hundred coins to citizens dear, A balm, however small, in fiscal gear.
The Liberals, stirred to partisan like zeal, Prepare their banners, with ardent appeal, Against Poilievre’s ascent so high, Their ads to rouse, and his rise to defy.
Yet Tory voices, though scarce aligned, To housing aid were loosely twined; Poilievre’s vow to cut, they fear to face, While Grits’ campaign chief takes up the chase.
In double-digits, the Tories soar, While jobs and coin top concerns galore; With fierce contention loyalty doth sway, As Trudeau’s base holds defeat at bay.
Court Painter, ever the mench, shows up to support an up and coming literary talent.
Here is a reenactment of what should have happened at the Trump rally if Court Painter had accepted the commission that AHM had negotiated with the Trump team, however Court Painter threw a snit and refused to appear claiming political asylum or sanity or something…
A little known substitute Staten Island painter was brought in and did a terrible job! He even used his hands to smear paint on the canvas, can you imagine!?
Court Painter would not be caught dead smearing paint since he is a virtuoso brush handler.
So, painter Scott Lobaido created a painting and vinyl image of Trump, live before President Donald J. Trump spoke at a rally at Madison Square Garden in New York City on Sunday, October 27, 2024.
Scott Lobaido’s introductory remarks made it clear he proudly proclaims a love of God, Girls and Guns!
Court Painter offers an honorable portrait of Hannah Arendt.
Also five portraits of current influential technologybillionaires who should be viewed as subjects of caution in the context of her analysis contained in The Human Condition.(1958)
Hannah Arendt (born October 14, 1906, Hannover, Germany—died December 4, 1975,New York, New York, U.S.) was a German-born American political scientist and philosopher known for her critical writing on Jewish affairs and her study of totalitarianism.
What You Can Learn from Just Seven Pages by Hannah Arendt
She wrote this book in the 1950s, but it’s frighteningly relevant right now
Today I turn my attention to an extraordinary analysis from Hannah Arendt’s book The Human Condition (1958). It’s so accurate, it’s almost scary.
Arendt is a constant source of inspiration for me. In this book, she warns us about technologists who are dangerous because they are so completely out-of-touch with their humanity. She wrote this book in the mid-1950s, but you might think she was living in Silicon Valley today.
Here’s what she says about these dangerous individuals in the opening pages of her 1958 book:
On page one she says that people who are disconnected with the human condition are obsessed with outer space and want to “escape man’s imprisonment to the earth.”
On page two, she says that these people are “directed towards making life artificial”—sort of like virtual reality.
On page three, she claims that they will eventually want to create “artificial machines to do our thinking and speaking….we would become the helpless slaves…at the mercy of every gadget which is technically possible, no matter how murderous it is.”
On page four, she warns us that scientists have already shown (with the development of the atomic bomb) that they create dangerous things but are “the last to be consulted about their use.” So any prediction a scientist makes about the use of new tech is totally worthless—politicians and tyrants will decide how it is used.
On page five, she explains that in this kind of society, freedom becomes almost worthless, because people are deprived of the “higher and more meaningful activities for the sake of which this freedom would deserve to be won.”
On page six, she says that the people pursuing this escape from the human condition are thus creating “modern world alienation.”
On page seven, she says that they inhabit “an ‘artificial’ world of things distinctly different from all natural surroundings”—so that their tech innovations will lead to an inevitable degradation of the environment, and a detachment from the real world.
Court Painter with rare flattering portrait of shattered anti CBC PP
Please Note: It is rumoured that Conservative Leader Pierre PoiLIEvre, in addition to refusing to get security clearance also refuses to read this survey!
Pierre “Broken record” PoiLIEvre
‘I can’t wait to defund the CBC’: Pierre Poilievre doubles down on plan to axe CBC contrary to Canadians Wanting to Reform and Grow the CBC — Not Cut It, National Survey Finds
National Survey: How Do Canadians Really Feel About the CBC?
Canadians Want to Reform and Grow the CBC — Not Cut It, National Survey Finds
Oct. 23, 2024
The future of CBC/Radio Canada has become a fixture of political debate, but to what extent does the partisan discourse match public sentiment? As the CBC/Radio-Canada undergoes its first formal mandate review since the 1990s, we asked Canadians how they feel about the CBC. Do Canadians really want to “defund the CBC?” A new national survey, Do We Need the CBC? examines how people feel about the current media landscape, and where Canada’s national public broadcaster fits within it.
The survey’s biggest insight: a majority of Canadians want to preserve the CBC/Radio-Canada.
Court Painter makes a bold prediction that Justin Trudeau leaves with his gloves in the air after the Wednesday meeting dust up! Any bets?
This report by The Canadian Press was first published Oct. 22, 2024.
OTTAWA — Prime Minister Justin Trudeau says his leadership of the Liberal party is not in danger, even as members of his caucus prepare to confront him Wednesday in the hopes of convincing him to step down.
He brushed off those concerns as he headed into his regular Tuesday meeting with cabinet ministers.
One by one, those ministers expressed their support for Trudeau as they spoke to reporters on their way into the meeting.
“Anybody who has ever bet against Justin Trudeau is sorry they made that bet the next day,” said Employment Minister Randy Boissonnault.
But while members of the cabinet have defended Trudeau staying on as leader, a number of Liberal MPs have signed onto a letter that aims to convince him to step aside before the next election.
It’s not clear how many members of Trudeau’s team of MPs plan to confront him, or exactly what their message will be. There is no way for the Liberal caucus to force Trudeau out, the decision about whether to stay or go will ultimately be up to the prime minister.
So far, Charlottetown MP Sean Casey is the only Liberal to publicly say that he has signed the letter.
Immigration Minister Marc Miller, who is also Trudeau’s personal friend, spoke out against MPs who hope to oust the leader.
‘After nine years in power, and polling 20 points behind the Conservatives for more than a year, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau is facing a serious challenge to his leadership from within his own caucus, and MPs and political insiders are predicting a showdown between a “motivated group” of more than 20 MPs pushing for a new leader before the next election, versus the prime minister and his supporters.
“It’s going to be a fight, an ugly fight,” said one Liberal MP, who is a Trudeau supporter and did not want to be identified, in an interview with The Hill Times. “You are going to see some people who will do what they said they’re going to do which is to say that he [Trudeau] should go, and you’re going to see a bunch of people fight back and say, ‘Look, even if we agree with you about the boss going, your approach has made it impossible to support you, and it’s a shame that you decide to take everybody down along with you guys.’ ”
Source: The Hill Times/Oct 18/24
Should he go or should he stay?
Meanwhile, Trudeau is deep in consultation with time proven methods to guide his decision
