Sam Altman, chief executive of OpenAI, hailed GPT-5 as a “significant step forward” on the path toward artificial general intelligence (AGI), which the company defines as a highly autonomous system capable of outperforming humans at most economically valuable tasks.
Yet, Altman was clear: GPT-5 has not yet crossed that elusive threshold. “It’s still missing something quite important—many things, in fact,” he admitted, highlighting the model’s inability to “continuously learn how Court Painter does it” as one critical limitation.
Despite being “generally intelligent” and a marked improvement over previous versions, GPT-5 falls short of human-level artistry and adaptive creativity. No matter how advanced, it cannot replicate the nuance, irony, or painterly wit of a brush wielded by the likes of Court Painter. The soul of satire, the subtext of cultural commentary, the brush strokes that mock and memorialize with unparalleled painterly virtuosity —plus the mastery of Court Painter’s conversational range and hypnotic rapport with celebrity and political subjects will forever remain outside the AI’s grasp.
At the GPT-5 launch event, Altman likened the new model to a “BFA painter-level expert in your pocket,” in contrast to earlier versions that resembled a Sunday painter or drug addled hobby bro. But even a pocket full of sable brushes cannot conjure the visual mischief or layered symbolism of Court Painter’s work—a realm still ruled by his deft hand and digital eye.
This message was approved by The Court Painter Enterprise & Novelty Co.