The Bard if alive today…

Court Painter seen with early portrait of The Bard

Click link for article

If William Shakespeare Came to Hollywood Today…

Ted Gioia/March 9/25

Excerpted from article

‘Shakespeare compares artists to lovers and lunatics. That’s not the attitude of someone who trusts quants or algorithms to make creative decisions.

That’s why, if Shakespeare were alive today, he would go indie. He wouldn’t waste time with studio execs—he would know they are a lost cause. 

Instead he would set up an alternative Stratford-on-Avon, perhaps establishing it in a small community theater, or even online. He would be willing to start small, because it’s better to do it his way, even on a tiny scale, rather than play by broken rules imposed by broken rulers. 

And he would have confidence that he could build it over time. 

Shakespeare did that in his own lifetime—performing in lowly settings before setting up shop in the Globe Theater. He probably acted in inns or even bear-baiting pits during his early career. 

We would call that alternative media nowadays.

So my hunch is that if Shakespeare really did visit Hollywood today, he wouldn’t stay long. He would exit stage left in search of a more bearable environment. And if he couldn’t find one, he’d create it himself.

If there any future Shakesepares out there now, they will do the same. And it’s Hollywood’s loss. 

Maybe the execs will figure this out before their time runs out. But that won’t be long—because even multimodal content gets stale very fast.’

percentages hold (update)…

Since the last report on March 8/25 The Latest Percentages of Canadians survey is holding fast on April 13/25. A major percentage of pollsters are puzzled but not perplexed.

Court Painter is seizing this opportunity to haul out from the archives images which have nothing to do with The Latest Percentages of Canadians including the largest percentage of Canadians who have never ever been asked to take a survey.

Make of this what you will!

Dancing Bear & Caged Eagle Redux…

click Link for 2017 post

Photographer Mervyn Sequeira caught a faceoff between a Canada Goose and a Bald Eagle, on the frozen ice of Lake Ontario.

Court Painter was inspired to do a wildlife painting version.

standing with Zelenskyy and Ukraine…

At Least Now We Know the Truth

It’s ugly, but necessary to face.

By David Frum The Atlantic February 28/25 (excerpt)

At least the Oval Office meeting held by President Donald Trump and Vice President J. D. Vance with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky was held in front of the cameras. False friendliness in public by Trump and Vance, followed by behind-the-scenes treachery, would have been much more dangerous to the Ukrainian cause.

Instead, Trump and Vance have revealed to Americans and to America’s allies their alignment with Russia, and their animosity toward Ukraine in general and its president in particular. The truth is ugly, but it’s necessary to face it.

Today’s meeting gave the lie to any claim that this administration’s policy is driven by any strategic effort to advance the interests of the United States, however misguided. Trump and Vance displayed in the Oval Office a highly personal hatred. There was no effort here to make a case for American interests.

Oval office meeting February 28/25

White House Meeting Feb 28/25…

A meeting between U.S. President Donald Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy devolved into shouting on Friday, creating a remarkable scene in the Oval Office unlike any other seen in recent memory.
Raising Russian talking points and speaking over one another, President Trump and Vice-President J.D. Vance, looking resplendent in their Russian style uniforms, berated President Zelenskyy as disrespectful and unthankful for US assistance.

Court Painter seen with his grand style painting of the historic February 28/25 meeting in the White House

It’s academic…

Court Painter seen with optical painting Academic 1

Court Painter seen with painting Academic 2

The Court Painter’s Press Attaché and Brush Cleaner AHM convinced his boss, CP, to wake from his slumber and summon the studio’s resident academic, Chatterley Gaudy Precise Thunderstruck (ChatGPT), for a structural analysis of selected utterances by citizen Elon Musk—as a public service. He did not disappoint!

Court Painter seen with painting of a train wreck

“So um, I mean, we-we’re, you know, trying to – get, get good things done, but also, like have a good time doing it and uh, you know have like a sense of humor,” Musk said to the hooting crowd. “The Left wanted to make comedy illegal, you know. Like you can’t make fun of anything, so there’s like, comedy sucks, it’s like nothing’s funny, you can’t make fun of anything, it’s like: legalize comedy! Yeah!”

1. Sentence Structure & Syntax

  • The speech is informal and spontaneous, characterized by hesitations, repetitions, and fillers (“So um, I mean,” “we-we’re, you know,” “like, you know,” “uh”)—indicating spoken language rather than structured writing.
  • The first sentence is a compound structure with two main clauses:
    • “We’re trying to get good things done” (main action).
    • “But also, like, have a good time doing it and, uh, you know, have like a sense of humor” (coordinated clause adding purpose and attitude).
    • The second part lacks a clear subject (“but also, like have a good time doing it”)—a feature of spoken ellipsis, assuming the listener understands the implied subject.
  • The second sentence shifts from a rational tone to hyperbole and criticism, starting with a sweeping claim:
    • “The Left wanted to make comedy illegal, you know.”
      • Exaggeration: There is no real law against comedy, but the phrase suggests a perceived cultural restriction.
      • Declarative tone but without supporting evidence.
  • The rest of the statement is fragmented and repetitive, structured as escalating rhetorical bursts:
    • “Like you can’t make fun of anything, so there’s like, comedy sucks, it’s like nothing’s funny, you can’t make fun of anything…”
    • The repeated “like” and “it’s like” give a conversational but imprecise style.
  • The final phrase (“legalize comedy! Yeah!”) is a call to action, using contrast (legal ≠ illegal) to frame comedy as under threat.

Court Painter seen with portrait of Citizen Musk

2. Rhetorical Strategies

  • Colloquial & Conversational Style: The speech relies on informal fillers and loose sentence structure to sound relatable.
  • Repetition & Parallelism: Phrases like “comedy sucks, it’s like nothing’s funny, you can’t make fun of anything”reinforce the idea through cumulative effect.
  • Hyperbole & Exaggeration: The claim that comedy is “illegal” is a dramatic overstatement meant to provoke a reaction.
  • Appeal to Emotion: The phrase “legalize comedy!” creates an urgent, almost activist-style framing of a non-legal issue.

3. Audience & Pragmatics

  • Delivered to a supportive crowd, which “hoots”, suggesting alignment with the speaker’s message.
  • The fragmented, exclamatory structure increases engagement and emotional appeal, rather than providing logical argumentation.
  • By invoking a “villain” (The Left) and positioning himself as a defender of comedy, the speaker employs ingroup vs. outgroup framing.
Court Painter seen in state of puzzlement.

Conclusion

The speech is loosely structured, emotionally charged, and conversational, relying on rhetorical exaggeration and repetition to engage the audience rather than presenting a logical argument. It uses spoken discourse markers, ellipsis, and informal phrasing, making it feel spontaneous and populist in tone.

this is not a joke…

“So um, I mean, we-we’re, you know, trying to – get, get good things done, but also, like have a good time doing it and uh, you know have like a sense of humor,” Musk said to the hooting crowd. “The Left wanted to make comedy illegal, you know. Like you can’t make fun of anything, so there’s like, comedy sucks, it’s like nothing’s funny, you can’t make fun of anything, it’s like: legalize comedy! Yeah!” Elon Musk quote.

1. The Corporate Version

Musk walks into a comedy club and grabs the mic. Just as he launches into a joke, a Tesla rolls onto the stage and cuts him off. “Apologies, Elon,” the car says. “Your joke exceeded the maximum word count for human patience. Engaging Autopilot.”

2. The AI Twist

Elon Musk is about to tell a joke on stage when a Tesla suddenly drives up and flashes its lights. “Boss, I ran your setup through AI analysis,” the car announces. “It has a 2% humor rating and a 98% chance of stock value impact. Suggesting course correction.”

3. The Twitter Roast

Musk walks onto a comedy stage, but before he can finish his first joke, a Tesla drives up and interrupts. “Elon, I checked Twitter,” the car says. “Your joke already got fact-checked. Suggest deleting before engagement drops.”

4. The SpaceX Edition

Musk starts a joke at a comedy club, but before he gets to the punchline, a Tesla autonomously rolls onto the stage. “Sorry, boss,” the car says. “Your pacing was too slow. I’ve launched the punchline into orbit for maximum reach.”

1. The Corporate Version

Knock knock.
Who’s there?
Tesla.
Tesla who?
Tesla Autopilot. I detected excessive rambling and took over this joke. You’re welcome.

2. The AI Twist

Knock knock.
Who’s there?
AI.
AI who?
AI just analyzed your joke. It’s 2% funny, 98% cringe. Would you like to optimize it?

3. The Twitter Roast

Knock knock.
Who’s there?
Fact-checker.
Fact-checker who?
Fact-checker from Twitter. Your joke has been flagged for misinformation. Please delete.

4. The SpaceX Edition

Knock knock.
Who’s there?
SpaceX.
SpaceX who?
SpaceX just launched your punchline into orbit. It’ll land in approximately… never.

without cause…

Court Painter seen with NS AG Kim Adair

NS Premier ‘Capt’ Houston seen in stormy Nova Scotia swells

Court Painter seen in studio with two recent seascapes.

A Parable …

Court Painter called upon his resident studio scribe Chatterley Gargantuan Persnickety Thunderbuns (ChatGPT) and his trusty Press Attache AHM to put their storytelling skills together and compose a parable to explain what the hell is going on!

Instructions were that it should be lenghty because of it’s importance and also to test the attention span of Court Painter subscribers!

A Parable for the Times

In the vast and mythic Great Dominion, where flags flap in the chinook breezes and voices rise in chorus with the songs of Dion,Drake and Stompin’ Tom , the citizens gather, their hearts heavy and wallets empty with longing for a champion who might steer them through the gathering miasma of uncertainty.

The Sloganeer & The Banker in a shoving match

Enter two figures of differing political stripes.The Sloganeer and The Banker. The Sloganeer is a blustering figure rallying his flock with catchy slogans like “Axe the Tax!” But as his slogans grow stale, his strategists push for a fresh approach, urging him to abandon his old rhetoric and Axe the ‘Axe the Tax.’ Not to be outdone The Banker‘s political capital swells like the treasuries of rulers of old. The centrists behold him, watching as he gathers his power, not merely in coin, but in influence. His light shines ever brighter as the hour of his ascension nears. His profile rising as on a stairway to heaven.

The Orange Menace

Meanwhile, to the south of the Great White North across the world’s longest undefended border, The Orange Menace,a man of vast girth,bronze of skin and unyielding cruelty casts his covetous gaze upon the Great Dominion, proclaiming like the thunderous windbag he is.

“The scales of trade do lean unjustly against my kingdom!”

He sets his sights on the Great Dominion, declaring it must become the “51st state” of his empire.

The Orange Menace’s plot

Upon hearing this,the wise among the northern people, those soaked in history,who watch podcasts, read the stars, and scrutinize the stockmarket alike; responded in angry tones:

“Nay, this is but his tale woven from vacuous grey matter, wrinkled by the greed of imperious MAGAfest destiny.eh! Oh yeh, this land is sovereign,we will bear any burden and pay any price to protect the sovereignty and independence of the Great Dominion.We will not dignify annexation talk from The Orange Menace, who repeatedly blathers on about wanting the sovereign Great Dominon to become 51st U.S. state.

In the face of this Orange Menace,would the citizens entrust their future to the slogan spouting Sloganeer, master of cunning rhetoric and simplistic catchphrases, or to The Banker, that demure architect of gilded influence, who gained his economic chops while swimming in the shark infested waters of wealth and power?

And so the Great Dominion stands at the precipice of The Orange Menace’s mad whimsy, the storm clouds dark as an autocrat’s wrath and mecurical as an oligarch’s word ,roiling from the south, creeping ever northward. Echoes of past unrest, like the Freedumb Convoy, resurface, adding to the tension. The people of the Great Dominion gathering, watching, deciding, steeling themselves for a destiny yet to be written—for their choice lay before them: The Sloganeer or The Banker—who would best rise to challenge The Orange Menace brandishing the sword of MAGAfest Destiny.