‘We’re going to continue to fight this fight’: Court Painter remains defiant towards Trudeau’s charcoal pricing plan

Court Painter continues to question the legality and constitutionality of the federal government’s proposed charcoal pricing plan.
Court Painter remained defiant on Tuesday, speaking publicly for the second time since Prime Minister Justin Trudeau announced the Liberal government’s plan to impose charcoal pricing on successful portrait studios that utilize charcoal extensively for preparatory sketches. Court Painter again wondered aloud how the federal government could “ impose a tax on this ancient and time tested material that placed in the hand of a gifted and masterful artist, enables the pictorial means to extract the soul of many political and celebrity sitters for posterity? How is that constitutional? I’ll at least ask that question.”

Court Painter said his Press attache A Hardon MacKay is looking into all legal options or constitutional challenges should the Liberal government move forward with the pricing plan that will tax all charcoal types whether compressed, vine, pencil, crayon or powder.

“I’m not sure how many other studios we’ll have join us in solidarity but I don’t care,” Court Painter said Tuesday during a brief media scrum in Calgary’s art district of Inglewood . “We’re going to continue to fight this fight. I will not have my hatching, rubbing, blending and erasing disrupted by nefarious federal left wing nut policies. I hope Mr. Trudeau realizes we artists have been using charcoal for 28,000 years.”
Here are a few more sound bites from Court painter’s scrum …

“I will form the foundation of some specific ideas,” he said, adding that ,“it’s never been like the Court Painter to criticize something without proposing an alternative idea. We’ll build on that a week from now and the weeks to follow that.”
“You think the Russian or the Belarusian portrait practitioners will ever have a $50 charcoal tax? They won’t.”

“There is a high percentage of those who would be impacted by a charcoal tax are working in art trade-exposed industries and rely on global pricing. The federal government has insisted that all money generated from a charcoal tax will go right back to the artist studio. Then what is the point?”, he snickered, “It sounds like a bureaucratic merry-go-round.”

“We should be using the considerable talents of studio assistants in the portrait industry to find ways to clean up studios from all that charcoal dust, rather than implementing a new tax or shifting charcoal around through cap-in-hand and begging bowl strategies that signify more left wing nut stuff.
Editors note: Court Painter when pressed for a clearer explanation sputtered that ,”he heard it through the grapevine and it was good enough for him.”
He went on to say ,“I would argue we’ve been leading the fight … In my studio, years ago when the art economy was stronger, we chose a path of least resistance to stabilize investments in charcoal dust-mitigation technology.”
Court Painter insisted the charcoal dust capture project in his studio is “the latest in cat’s ass technology ” when it comes to capture but not release. “I’ve been doing that. I’ve led in that, in fact.”
“We take this issue seriously but a charcoal tax … will disproportionately hurt my portrait economy. That’s not a solution.”

Court Painter, last week, said in a statement that ,“the level of disrespect shown by the Prime Minister and his government … is stunning.”
Trudeau has said charcoal pricing will be imposed on artists that don’t match the tax or implement a capture & storage system for the clouds of charcoal dust emissions clogging the lungs,hearts and minds of the local proletariat.

Court Painter stressed his position again on Tuesday that a significant tax on his studio would mean fewer jobs for his unpaid studio interns. He acknowledged kicking and screaming that portrait painters of the Great Dominion need to address excess charcoal dust in their studios, but said that can be done through technological solutions and adaptation as long as the government assures plenty of commissions and subsidized framing costs.